All Posts in Category: public debate
Globalization, and an open-source mentality have changed our thinking almost overnight about what constitutes a copy versus an original. Copying not only has legal and cultural repercussions; it bears on moral and psychological issues as well.
Fear of Being Copied
The tension that immediately arises when speaking about copying proves its relevance and explosive potential – not only in the field of design. Aside from the formal and juristic consequences, in design there is a “moral of authenticity” that is deeply rooted in western culture. What would happen if we could let go of this ‘authenticity’?
Another issue at stake is the similarity between copying and inspiration. Every designer will study examples of designers that inspire him. Designing is in part copying, leaning, re-using; placing an old idea in a new context. It’s foolish to reinvent the wheel, so we cut and paste from all kinds of sources of inspiration. And since the rise of the internet those sources are even more accessible: with a couple of clicks we can see everything, everywhere. Instantly.
Different Attitudes of Asia and Europe
The question of where inspiration ends and copying begins can be answered from personal, cultural, and moral standpoints, but also from commercial and legal points of view. Cultural differences certainly have an effect on where one stands in this debate. It has always been said, for example, that Asia and Europe have very different attitude towards copying; that originality and authenticity have different meanings in different cultures. In Japan and China, where a totally different ethical code governs authorship, you are considered a ‘master’ if you are able to copy good craftsmanship. Here in the West however, originality is at the heart of design culture.
Legal questions surround copyright culture. How is copyright built? What are the premises? How do we define a copy from moral, legal, and cultural points of view? Should copying be deplored or could it be also seen as a process towards perfection or the development of skills? Could it be regarded as the predictable consequence of an ever-present marketing, branding and personality cult?
In the likelihood of a future society dominated by copy culture, what changes will we see? Will patents and copyrights lose their raison d’étre, becoming artifacts of mass industrialization? Will they be replaced by open source concepts, appropriation and personalization? What will be the designer’s role in a shared and thus reciprocal relationship with a new, potentially multi-faceted breed of user, client, producer, reseller and co-developer?
Watch the project on Dezeen: click here
Gratis_Tanken translates as “free gasoline”, but the word “tanken” (as in “gas tank”) sounds just like the Dutch “denken” (thinking). The title is thus very close to ‘Free Thinking’, and that’s what it’s all about. Filling up your tank excites everybody, and in this case, Gratis_Tanken is about mentally refilling your mind.
Gratis_Tanken is an experimental format for public debate. The public is not physically there, but is kept informed and committed in several different ways. Ten years ago, we sent out rich e-mails (at the time a very new concept) with the results of the debates.
Much like with Facebook or Twitter today, the broader public was able to interact by replying to quotes written by journalists who had attended the sessions. Although each Gratis_Tanken session could have a central topic, the format, as the title would suggest, was always most effective for the investigation of free thoughts.
Personally, I doubted the format would still work, but I was positively surprised. It felt like a dinner with close friends who all understood each other very well. That may sound simplistic, but for a semi-public event it was extraordinary.
Im memoriam: Ineke Schwartz
The occasion of this publication is a sad one as well: in the first image above you can see that Ineke Schwartz moderated Gratis_Tanken with me. Ineke died of a serious disease more than five years ago.
I still miss her, and I know that I am not alone. Ineke was a very good chairman, and a true inspiration to me. I am proud to have worked with her, and she is one of the reasons that I keep on Gratis Tanken.
Meanwhile I have done two more Gratis Tanken, in a slightly bigger group.
In the above picture we are in Breda, with leaders of the cultural sector. In the picture beneath, we are in Schieblock, for an Nai discussion on Traditionalsm.